The State of Safety: How LGBTQIA+ People Are Navigating a Changing America
Rising hate crimes and political backlash have renewed focus on community resilience and local networks that keep people safe and connected.
The safety of LGBTQIA+ people in the United States is increasingly defined by a sharp contrast: documented rises in hate-motivated targeting and restrictive laws on one side, and rapidly evolving networks of mutual aid, chosen family, and local organizing on the other. Together, these forces are reshaping how queer and trans people move through schools, workplaces, clinics, and public space—and how they work to keep one another safe in a changing America.
Rising threats in daily life
Federal hate-crime statistics show that while overall violent crime has recently declined, reported hate crimes have climbed, with sexual orientation and gender identity now among the most common motives. In 2023, incidents tied to sexual orientation and gender identity bias increased by roughly 8.6% compared with the year before, even as other categories of violence fell, underscoring that LGBTQIA+ people are being singled out at a time when crime is otherwise easing.
Advocacy groups warn that the statistics still undercount the true scope of danger, citing persistent underreporting and data gaps in local policing. A recent analysis from the Williams Institute estimated that LGBTQ Americans face a hate-crime victimization rate several times higher than non-LGBTQ people, reinforcing what many already experience in their daily calculations about where it is safe to live, work, or simply hold hands in public.
Law, policy, and a new era of restriction
That sense of vulnerability is amplified by a wave of state-level measures that target LGBTQIA+ people in schools, health care, and public life. Civil-rights monitors report that, in recent sessions, hundreds of bills have been introduced across the country to restrict gender-affirming care, limit changes to identification documents, curb discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in classrooms, and narrow protections in public accommodations.
By mid-2025, more than half of U.S. states had enacted some kind of restriction on gender-affirming care for minors, with several making certain treatments a felony for providers, a move medical and human-rights organizations say contradicts established standards of care. National tracking by legal groups shows a broad pattern: bills that carve out exceptions to otherwise standard medical treatments when the patient is transgender, or that exempt cisgender patients from the same restrictions, effectively creating separate rules based on gender identity.
Federal shifts and their ripple effects
At the federal level, the policy landscape has also shifted, with new executive actions reshaping what can be taught about gender and sexuality and how institutions receive funding. One recent order by the Trump administration directs agencies to withhold funds from schools it deems to be promoting “gender ideology,” and encourages legal scrutiny of educators who support students in social or medical transition, a move that legal scholars say could chill supportive practices even where they remain lawful.
National civil-rights organizations describe the current moment as a “state of emergency” for LGBTQIA+ people, pointing to the unprecedented number of bills introduced in recent years that would curtail rights and access to services.
Human-rights organizations report that, in anticipation of funding cuts or political backlash, some universities and hospitals have already reduced or ended LGBTQ-focused programs and research, with tangible consequences for access to affirming care and inclusive sex education. Advocates argue that these rollbacks are not merely symbolic, but shape which services are available, which studies are funded, and which young people receive medically accurate, affirming information about their bodies and identities.
Personal fallout: health, school, and home

For transgender youth and their families, bans on gender-affirming care translate into abruptly interrupted treatment, forced travel to other states, or going without care altogether. Research from health-policy organizations links these disruptions to elevated risks of depression and suicidality among trans youth, who already report higher rates of mental-health challenges than their cisgender peers. Parents in affected states describe making decisions about uprooting households or arranging clandestine telehealth appointments simply to maintain continuity of care.
In schools, laws constraining discussions of gender and sexuality—or requiring parental notification when students come out—have reshaped daily classroom dynamics. Counselors and teachers report that some LGBTQ students now avoid seeking help or participating in support groups, fearing that conversations could trigger legal obligations that put them at odds with unsupportive families.
Sports, IDs, and public space
Beyond schools and clinics, new rules are also redefining who can participate fully in public life. In some states, laws now bar transgender girls and women from competing on school sports teams aligned with their gender identity, and impose administrative or medical hurdles for changing gender markers on IDs. Supporters frame these measures as protecting fairness or privacy, but civil-rights groups say they effectively single out trans people for exclusion and increase the risk of being “outed” in everyday encounters with law enforcement, employers, or healthcare workers.
For many individuals, these legal changes compound existing fears about harassment in bathrooms, locker rooms, and other gendered spaces. Advocates and researchers note that limiting access to appropriate facilities and accurate identification documents does not eliminate trans people from public spaces; instead, it increases the likelihood of conflict and violence when identity documents or appearances do not align with the expectations of authorities or bystanders.
Community resilience and chosen family

Against this backdrop, LGBTQIA+ communities are expanding longstanding strategies of mutual care, often framed as “chosen family”—networks of friends, partners, and allies who provide practical and emotional support outside of biological or legal ties. Social-science research has documented how these chosen families help people rebuild support systems after rejection or estrangement, offering housing, financial help, and everyday care that can be life-saving for those facing discrimination and violence.
Mental-health practitioners describe chosen family as a critical protective factor: a buffer against isolation that can mitigate some of the psychological harm caused by hostile policies and rhetoric. Community organizations, from local LGBTQ centers to informal online groups, now explicitly encourage people to identify and strengthen these networks, emphasizing regular check-ins, shared responsibilities, and collective safety planning as everyday practices.
Local safety strategies and mutual aid
On the ground, safety strategies are increasingly localized and peer-driven. LGBTQ centers and grassroots collectives report running self-defense workshops, digital-security trainings, and “know your rights” sessions tailored to encounters with police, school officials, and healthcare providers. Mutual-aid groups organize ride-shares to affirming clinics, small emergency funds for rent or legal fees, and volunteer-led accompaniment for people who feel unsafe traveling alone to appointments or court dates.
These efforts are often low-profile by design, arising from neighborhood group chats, online forums, or long-standing community spaces rather than large institutions. Organizers say that in an environment where laws and policies can shift rapidly, flexible, trust-based networks are sometimes more reliable than formal systems, which may be constrained by new legal mandates or political pressure.
A contested future
National civil-rights organizations describe the current moment as a “state of emergency” for LGBTQIA+ people, pointing to the unprecedented number of bills introduced in recent years that would curtail rights and access to services.
At the same time, many of those proposals fail or are blocked in court, and there is growing public awareness of the human cost of restrictions on healthcare, education, and public participation.
For LGBTQIA+ individuals and communities, navigating this changing America means more than tracking legislative maps or crime statistics; it means constantly weighing risk, cultivating resilience, and investing in relationships and local networks that can step in where laws and institutions fall short.
That daily work of survival and solidarity is quietly redefining what safety looks like—and who is responsible for providing it—in a country where rights and protections can shift with each election cycle.
