Why chasing a bigger nest egg isn’t always the same as living well
According to the National Council on Aging(NCOA), in the United States, roughly 93 % of adults aged 65 and older live with at least one chronic health condition, and nearly 79 % have two or more. These numbers remind us that life isn’t measured in dollars alone; health and time often matter far more than a bigger 401(k) or a fatter nest egg. Too many people spend decades planning for a retirement that assumes they’ll have both perfect health and endless energy.
Before stiffness, fatigue, or memory lapses start shaping your days, there’s a world to explore, friends to see, and experiences to have. Waiting for “someday” is a gamble with your only nonrenewable resource: time. The grass is waiting, the city streets hum with life, and the trails, beaches, and concert halls won’t pause for your perfect financial plan.
Maybe the question we should be asking isn’t how much we can save, but how much life we can truly live while we’re still capable of walking out the door and touching grass. What would it mean to measure success not by dollars, but by moments, memories, and meaning? Perhaps it’s time to rethink the whole premise of accumulation and put living first.
Redefining Success
Most Americans grow up with the idea that success is measured by net worth, houses, and retirement balances, a “big nest egg” as proof of life done right. But that definition misses the deeper dimensions of fulfillment that don’t appear on a balance sheet.
Evidence from social science challenges the assumption that money automatically equals well-being: in work by Amit Kumar et al., people report more moment‑to‑moment happiness when they spend on experiences than when they spend the same amount on material possessions. This suggests that a life built around experience, connection, and memory, not just accumulation, produces more lasting joy.
In other words, spending on travel, learning, or shared time with others often yields richer emotional returns than upgraded gadgets or status symbols. Redefining success to include meaning and presence rather than just wealth opens the door to rethinking how we live.
The Freedom of Financial Nihilism
At first glance, nihilism, the belief that life has no intrinsic meaning, feels like an odd companion to financial planning. But optimistic nihilism offers profound relief from the pressure of the nest-egg culture. If there is no cosmic scorecard and no one is winning at life by having the largest estate, then the crushing weight of financial comparison vanishes.
When we accept that our names, our wealth, and our material legacies will eventually fade into insignificance, we are freed from the ego-driven need to accumulate for its own sake. If nothing matters in a thousand years, the only thing that matters now is the quality of your current experience and the depth of your current connections.
Security Should Serve Life and Not Replace It
Too many people treat saving for the future as a substitute for living fully today. They defer travel, hobbies, and meaningful experiences, thinking that happiness can be bought later with a bigger nest egg. The problem is that life is unpredictable: health, opportunities, and energy aren’t guaranteed.
Security is most valuable when it supports the choices you want to make, not when it dictates how you live. Taking small steps, a weekend getaway, a class you’ve always wanted to try, or extra time with friends adds richness to life in ways that money alone cannot.
Treat savings as a foundation, not the goal; it should give you freedom, not anxiety. When security serves life rather than replaces it, every day becomes an opportunity to live intentionally.
Why More Money Isn’t Always More Joy
A powerful reason many Americans chase bigger paychecks is the assumption that more money means more happiness. But foundational research by Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton shows that while life evaluation, how people judge their lives overall, often rises with income, emotional well-being, and feeling good in daily moments, it tends to plateau beyond roughly $75,000 per year.
This doesn’t mean money never buys happiness, but it does mean the emotional boost from extra income diminishes once basic needs and security are met. More recent work, including an adversarial collaboration between Kahneman and Matthew Killingsworth, shows that the relationship is complex and varies with individual well-being, but the core idea stands: the value of each extra dollar for happiness declines over time.
If happiness were a simple function of income, we wouldn’t see this flattening effect. Instead, the research urges us to ask: what kind of happiness are we really seeking?
Time Is the Ultimate Currency
Time is the one resource you can never earn back once it’s spent; it’s gone, and yet Americans routinely trade it for more money, often at the cost of their well-being. Spending money on services that free up time (such as outsourcing chores or reducing pressure) leads to higher life satisfaction than spending on material purchases.
It means a parent who pays for childcare or housecleaning may gain more happiness from regained time with loved ones than from a bigger paycheck. Framing time as our deepest currency forces a different set of life choices: fewer hours in the office, more hours in parks, with friends, or learning new skills. When time becomes a priority equal to or greater than money, the way we define a life well lived changes, and for many Americans, that’s a liberating shift.
The Psychological Cost of Financial Obsession
American culture often equates financial success with peace of mind, but the evidence doesn’t fully support that equation. People who obsess over maximizing income frequently experience higher stress and anxiety, even after their needs are met. Pursuit of money for its own sake can distract from relationships, community, and creative pursuits that fuel lasting satisfaction.
A fixation on the future can also lead to deferred living, where the enjoyment of life is constantly postponed for a someday that may never feel satisfying. Letting go of money as the sole arbiter of success can relieve psychological pressure and open space for a richer life today.
Experiences Over Possessions: The Happiness Edge
One of your strongest original points is that experiences often give more happiness than material goods, and there’s good evidence for this. In the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, researchers found that people reported greater happiness when spending on experiences (such as travel, events, or meals) than when spending on things (such as clothing or gadgets), even when the price was the same.
This experiential advantage appears because experiences often create social memories, contribute to identity, and don’t wear out the way objects do; literally, they last longer in our minds than in our closets. The effect shows up before, during, and after the experience itself. When you prioritize doing over having, you shift your life toward stories, connection, and growth, which are at the heart of what it means to live well.
Community, Connection, and Meaning
Money can’t buy friendship, love, or belonging, yet these are among the strongest predictors of happiness. The National Institutes of Health and multiple psychology studies show that strong social ties increase emotional well-being, reduce stress, and even improve physical health.
Americans who invest time in relationships, volunteering, or community projects consistently report higher satisfaction than those who focus solely on career and wealth. The emotional return from meaningful connection surpasses that of a larger bank balance, yet it is often overlooked in financial planning.
Prioritizing people over possessions can create networks of support, resilience, and shared joy. In essence, a life rich in relationships is more sustainable than a life rich only in money. Choosing to focus on community transforms financial freedom into emotional freedom.
Lessons from Minimalism and Intentional Living
Movements like minimalism and intentional living demonstrate that less can be more. Americans who adopt these philosophies often report higher life satisfaction, lower stress, and a stronger sense of purpose, even without material abundance.
By removing distractions and unnecessary possessions, they free attention and resources for experiences, relationships, and personal growth. Surveys and case studies show that these practices lead to clearer priorities and reduced anxiety over societal pressures to consume.
Simplification and intentional choices reduce decision fatigue and improve well-being. For those trapped on the wealth-accumulation treadmill, adopting intentional living strategies can create a profound shift in happiness.
Designing Your Life Around Values
Ultimately, a life well lived is not defined by dollars but by alignment with personal values. Positive psychology emphasizes that people who structure their decisions around core principles of autonomy, growth, relationships, and contribution report higher life satisfaction than those guided primarily by financial metrics.
For Americans, this means asking: what experiences, people, and contributions truly matter? When money is treated as a tool to support these aims rather than the goal itself, decisions become freer and more meaningful.
The ultimate insight: wealth facilitates life, but values shape it. Living according to values produces a richer, more enduring sense of fulfillment than chasing ever-larger financial milestones.
Key Takeaway
Life well lived isn’t measured by the size of your bank account or the length of your 401(k). True fulfillment comes from how you spend your time, the experiences you embrace, and the relationships you nurture. Security and savings are important, but they should serve your life, not replace it.
Prioritizing experiences, meaningful work, personal growth, and connection over material accumulation leads to lasting satisfaction. In short, a rich life isn’t about wealth; it’s about living fully, intentionally, and in alignment with your values.
Disclosure line: This article was written with the assistance of AI and was subsequently reviewed, revised, and approved by our editorial team.
Like our content? Be sure to follow us
