10 Bible verses both sides use in the abortion debate

Bible verses once thought to offer clear moral guidance now fuel some of America’s most bitter debates over abortion.

The conversation around reproductive rights is often loud and deeply personal, splitting friends and families across dinner tables nationwide. It is rare to find a middle ground because both sides feel their position is rooted in something absolute and undeniable. For many Americans, that absolute foundation is the Bible, which gets quoted frequently to justify competing viewpoints.

While specific verses get tossed around like legal evidence, the interpretation often depends heavily on who is doing the reading. People on both sides of the aisle point to the same ancient texts to support modern political stances. Interestingly, the Bible does not explicitly mention the word abortion, leaving plenty of room for heavy debate.

Psalm 139:13-16 The Knitting In The Womb

This passage is likely the most cited text in the entire conversation because it paints a poetic picture of God’s handiwork inside the womb. Pro-life advocates see this as definitive proof that God is personally involved in fetal development from the very start. According to a Pew Research Center study, 63% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases, yet verses like this keep the moral questions alive.

Critics argue that this is poetry rather than biology or legal code, meant to praise God’s omniscience rather than define personhood. They suggest the psalmist is expressing awe at creation rather than setting a policy for modern medical ethics. You have to decide if poetry should drive legislation or if it simply reflects a spiritual truth about human value.

Exodus 21:22-25 The Case Of The Accidental Miscarriage

This Old Testament legal code describes a scenario where fighting men hit a pregnant woman and cause her to give birth prematurely. If there is no serious injury to the woman, the penalty is just a fine, but if she dies, the penalty is life for life. Those favoring abortion rights argue this proves the fetus does not have the same legal status or value as the woman.

Opponents look at the same text and insist the “serious injury” clause applies to the child as well as the mother. They claim the text protects both lives equally and sets a high value on the unborn by demanding a fine for even accidental loss. It is a dense legal passage that scholars have argued over for centuries without reaching a total consensus.

Jeremiah 1:5 I Knew You Before I Formed You

This verse recounts the prophet Jeremiah’s call to ministry, stating that God sanctified him before he was even born. It is a powerful slogan for the pro-life movement because it suggests a divine relationship exists before conception. Guttmacher Institute data from March 2024 shows that medication abortion accounted for 63% of all US abortions in 2023, highlighting how early most procedures now happen.

Context matters here, as others point out; this was a specific address to a prophet rather than a blanket statement about every human fetus. They argue that applying a specific prophetic calling to general biology stretches the text too far beyond its original intent. The debate hinges on whether Jeremiah’s experience is a universal precedent or a special divine exception.

Genesis 2:7 The Breath Of Life

In the creation story, Adam does not become a “living being” until God breathes the breath of life into his nostrils. Many Jewish scholars and abortion rights supporters point to this as evidence that life begins at first breath, not at conception. This interpretation provides a scriptural basis for prioritizing the life of the mother over the fetus before birth occurs.

Those disagreeing say this describes the creation of the first man from dust, which is totally different from human procreation today. They believe biological life clearly starts earlier and that the breath metaphor shouldn’t define medical personhood. A recent Gallup poll found that 51% of Americans now identify as pro-choice, a sentiment that often aligns with this breath-focused reading.

Luke 1:41-44 The Leaping Infant

When Mary visits her pregnant cousin Elizabeth, the baby in Elizabeth’s womb leaps for joy at the presence of the unborn Jesus. This narrative is beloved by pro-life groups who see it as clear evidence of fetal awareness, emotion, and humanity. They argue that if a fetus can recognize the divine, it is undeniably a person worthy of full protection.

Skeptics view this as a miraculous literary device used to highlight the importance of Jesus, not a medical fact about all pregnancies. They caution against using a supernatural event to create laws for the general public. Despite these differing religious views, the number of abortions in the US rose to over 1 million in 2023, the highest level in a decade, according to Guttmacher.

Numbers 5:11-31 The Test Of Bitter Water

This strange passage describes a ritual used by a priest when a husband suspects his wife of adultery. If she is guilty, the “bitter water” she drinks causes her womb to miscarry and her abdomen to swell. Some interpreters argue this is actually a divinely sanctioned abortion performed by a priest, challenging the idea that God is always against ending a pregnancy.

Others strongly push back, claiming the text describes a divine judgment or curse resulting in infertility, not a medical procedure. They insist the passage is about exposing infidelity and has nothing to do with voluntary abortion choices. It remains one of the most controversial and confusing sections of scripture regarding reproductive issues.

Job 10:8-12 Hands That Shaped Me

Job speaks to God in his suffering, acknowledging that God’s hands shaped and made him like clay. This reinforces the idea of intentional design, similar to the Psalms, and is used to argue for the sanctity of life. Public Religion Research Institute found that 69% of white mainline Protestants support abortion legality, showing that reverence for creation doesn’t always lead to a ban.

The counter-argument focuses on Job’s misery, noting that he actually wishes he had never been born or had died in the womb. Using Job’s poetic laments to create strict moral laws ignores the context of his extreme suffering and despair. You cannot easily separate Job’s acknowledgment of God’s power from his wish to escape his own life.

Isaiah 49:1 Called From The Womb

Similar to Jeremiah, this verse speaks of being called and named by God while still in the mother’s body. It serves as an anchor for those who believe every individual has a destiny that begins before birth. For voters who prioritize this view, the issue is paramount; a 2024 KFF survey notes that 1 in 8 voters says abortion is the most important issue in their vote.

Critics again point to the specific nature of the text, which refers to the Servant of the Lord or Israel, not necessarily every pregnancy. They maintain that poetic descriptions of destiny are not the same as biological definitions of life. The friction comes from trying to apply ancient prophecy to the modern legal framework of rights.

Ecclesiastes 11:5 The Mystery Of The Spirit

This wisdom literature admits that we do not know the path of the wind or how the body is formed in a mother’s womb. It is a humble admission of human ignorance regarding the mysteries of life and God’s work. Some use this to argue for a less rigid stance, suggesting we should not pretend to know exactly when the soul enters the body.

Conversely, others see this mystery as a reason to be incredibly cautious and protective of the unborn. If we do not know how God works in the womb, they argue we should default to preserving life. It suggests that perhaps there are aspects of life and death that are simply beyond human legislation.

Matthew 25:40 The Least Of These

Jesus teaches that whatever is done for the “least of these” brothers and sisters is done for him. The pro-life movement frequently applies this to the unborn, viewing them as the most vulnerable and voiceless group in society. They believe this command creates a moral imperative to protect fetuses from harm.

Social justice advocates, however, apply this verse to the women facing poverty, health crises, or abuse who seek abortions. They argue that forcing women to carry pregnancies against their will ignores the suffering of the “least of these” already born. Both sides claim the moral high ground here, using the same call to compassion to reach opposite conclusions.

Like our content? Be sure to follow us