10 reasons entry-level jobs are tougher now for women graduates

A first-class degree. Two internships. Solid references. Yet the only offer you might receive is a six-month unpaid traineeship with no guarantee of a permanent role: the new reality of the workforce industry.

In 2024, the International Labour Organization reported that young women are 1.3 times as likely as young men to be unemployed or underemployed, even when they hold equivalent qualifications.

LinkedIn’s 2025 workforce data show early-career women are switching jobs faster than any other demographic, not out of restlessness, but because the entry-level system itself is failing to deliver stability, meaningful growth, and fair compensation.

Entry-Level Now Requires Experience You Don’t Yet Have

Once upon a time, an entry-level role meant precisely that: “no prior experience required.” Today, a junior job posting can quietly demand 2–3 years of experience with advanced tools, software, or certifications.

The 2024 Burning Glass Institute reports that over 35% of entry-level postings exceed traditional experience expectations, a phenomenon called “degree inflation.” Women are disproportionately affected, particularly those without elite-school connections, because informal networks often provide insider knowledge and opportunities that can substitute for formal experience.

Mirror the job posting language in your CV and cover letter. Highlight concrete projects, leadership, and measurable outcomes. Even if you lack formal experience, recruiters and ATS systems reward evidence of capability, not just years served.

Risk-Averse Hiring Reinforces Hidden Bias

Why do hiring freezes or slowdowns hit women harder?

When hiring slows, organizations often default to “safe” candidates; those resembling the existing workforce. The employee referrals.com labor market brief shows referral-based hires can spike by up to 40% during uncertain periods. Since existing networks in sectors like finance, tech, and consulting skew male, early-career women are disproportionately filtered out.

Sociologist Mark Granovetter’s research demonstrates that acquaintances, alumni, and colleagues outside your immediate network are more effective for uncovering opportunities than close friends. Amina began attending virtual alumni meetups and informational sessions. One casual conversation led to an interview at a startup that became her first paid role.

Building visibility beyond your immediate circle creates a strategic safety net. The tip is integrated here: networking isn’t just a checkbox; it’s risk management for early-career progression.

Unpaid Internships Are the New Norm

Internships, historically stepping stones, now often replace actual entry-level jobs. The National Association of Colleges and Employers found that 45% of internships globally remain unpaid, a trend that disproportionately affects women, who feel societal pressure to “prove themselves.”

Accepting a six-month unpaid internship, expecting mentorship and conversion to a full-time role. By week two, you realize you are effectively doing the work of a junior analyst without compensation. Many silently endure. Instead, negotiate a modest travel stipend and guaranteed monthly check-ins with your supervisor, framing it professionally. The company might agree, and the experience could serve as a stepping stone to a paid role.

Treat unpaid internships as negotiable. Ask for travel allowances, small stipends, or clear conversion criteria upfront. Framing requests professionally, not as demands, turns unpaid work into a sustainable bridge to paid opportunities.

AI Resume Filters Aren’t Neutral

It may seem fair that AI screens resumes, but automated systems can disadvantage women candidates. A 2023 Brookings Institution audit found algorithms trained on historical hiring data often penalize collaborative verbs (“coordinated,” “supported”) compared to assertive ones (“led,” “executed”), skewing results in favor of male candidates.

Reframe collaborative experience in terms of measurable results. This ensures both AI and human reviewers recognize your impact, not just participation.

“Culture Fit” Often Masks Subtle Exclusion

Culture fit, often touted as a neutral standard, frequently hides bias. A global consulting firm removed “culture fit” from its hiring rubric in 2022. Within a year, the number of women hired increased by 12%, as reported internally and later cited by McKinsey.

Instead of trying to “blend in,” turn culture-fit questions into evidence of contribution. Ask, “What does success look like in the first six months?” This focuses conversations on outcomes rather than subjective judgments, allowing women to demonstrate value based on results rather than similarity.

Early Pay Transparency Gaps Are Costly

Even in countries with pay-transparency laws, entry-level salaries often remain opaque. OECD 2024 data shows that gender pay gaps emerge at the first job, and early discrepancies compound over a career.

A recent LinkedIn analysis found that women accepting low first-job offers earn 5–8% less than men in equivalent roles, even before negotiation.

Ask about salary bands during early interviews, framing it as a way to align expectations. Doing so early establishes transparency, positions you professionally, and protects long-term earning potential.

Soft Skills Are Praised, Not Paid For

Women consistently excel in communication, collaboration, and adaptability—but these skills are often undervalued in entry-level pay. The 2024 World Economic Forum report highlights this discrepancy: organizations reward technical outputs over interpersonal competence.

Convert soft skills into measurable outcomes in every CV bullet and interview answer. This makes previously invisible contributions visible to evaluators.

Structured Career On-Ramps Are Shrinking

Traditional graduate programs, rotational schemes, and apprenticeships are disappearing. The UK Office for National Statistics reports a 20–30% reduction in structured graduate programs since 2020, disproportionately affecting women who rely on standardized evaluation pathways.

Look for lateral entry points, project coordination, operations, or customer success. These roles often offer transferable experience, mentorship opportunities, and potential for internal promotion, mirroring the benefits of formal graduate programs.

Early Job-Hopping Is Often Strategic

Early-career women often switch jobs not out of impatience, but to hedge risk. LinkedIn’s 2025 Workforce Confidence survey found instability, short-term contracts, and unclear promotion paths as the top reasons for job changes.

Ask one critical question: “What happened to the last person in this role?” The answer reveals retention patterns, managerial expectations, and the role’s viability, allowing you to preempt instability and plan career moves strategically.

Mentorship Gaps Leave Women Navigating Alone

A 2024 Deloitte report found that formal mentorship in hybrid and remote entry-level roles has sharply declined. Women are less likely to receive informal guidance, leading to slower promotion and fewer advocates.

Build a micro-mentorship board: one peer, one internal senior, and one external professional. This diversified network provides feedback, visibility, and advocacy, effectively compensating for the disappearing formal mentorship programs.

Key Takeaways

• Entry-level work now demands more while offering less support, disproportionately affecting women.
• Bias has shifted into AI tools, referrals, and subjective evaluations. Early recognition mitigates disadvantage.
• Early decisions on pay, stability, mentorship, and lateral moves compound over time.
• Job-hopping is often a strategic adaptation, not failure.
• Quantify skills, embed evidence in narratives, and treat early career moves as risk-managed experiments.

Disclosure line: This article was written with the assistance of AI and was subsequently reviewed, revised, and approved by our editorial team.

Like our content? Be sure to follow us