Women are asked to pick up the slack as young men drop out: 10 reasons why

In 2021, the National Institutes of Health noted that deaths involving synthetic opioids were about 29 per 100,000 for men, compared with just over 11 per 100,000 for women, reflecting a stark gender disparity in overdose mortality.

But these figures only hint at a deeper social cost: for every man debilitated by addiction or unable to work, there is often an unpaid caregiver keeping family life afloat. With addiction disabling a disproportionate number of working‑age men, many women, mothers, partners, and sisters assume the full-time, intensive responsibility of care.

They often juggle their own jobs, household management, childcare, and the emotional labor of supporting a partner or family member through recovery with little institutional support. While men’s economic disengagement and health crises erode their labor force participation, women’s incomes, schedules, and emotional resilience frequently absorb the fallout.

Though Not New, Male Labor Force Decline Intensifies Since 2000

The decline in male labor force participation among prime‑age men (25–54) is well‑documented by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ data. In 1950, roughly 97% of prime‑age men were in the labor force; by 2025, this figure had fallen below 89%.

Economist Alan Krueger has tracked this trend as a long‑term secular decline, accelerated not just by recessions but by structural changes in labor demand.

The decline cannot be attributed solely to cyclical downturns; even during economic expansions, male participation has lagged.

The National Bureau of Economic Research identified factors, including a decline in manufacturing jobs, automation, and the diminishing returns to low‑skill labor.

Prime‑age male non‑participation is not anecdotal; millions of men remain outside the workforce, a trend that predates COVID‑19 and, in some measures, has worsened since.

Female Labor Force Participation Has Been the Complement, Not the Cause

Between 1960 and 2000, women’s labor force participation climbed dramatically, driven by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964), the Equal Pay Act (1963), and the expansion of higher education.

By the early 1990s, women had become a dominant force in the workforce; today, nearly 47% of U.S. workers are women, according to the BLS.

Crucially, women’s labor force growth does not statistically cause a decline in male labor force growth. Research by Claudia Goldin shows that the drivers differ: educational attainment and cultural norms around female work versus deindustrialization and automation for men.

Women did not “replace” men; women entered the economy on a different trajectory that became complementary rather than substitutive.

Economic Security Is Central to Union Formation

Decades of research show a strong link between male economic prospects and marriage rates. Sociologist Andrew Cherlin’s work (The Marriage Go‑Round, 2009) shows U.S. marriage rates have fallen sharply for men without stable labor market attachment.

Data from the Current Population Survey demonstrates that men with full‑time employment are far more likely to be married than those without.

The Institute for Family Studies concludes that less‑educated men are significantly less likely to marry, largely because of economic insecurity, not lack of desire for relationships.

This has feminized the risk of “caregiver burden” as women increasingly delay marriage or assume long‑term single‑parent roles.

Educational Gaps Predict Labor Outcomes, And They Are Widening

Women now earn 58% of bachelor’s degrees, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

In contrast, men, especially white and Black men without college degrees, are falling behind academically, a trend documented by Richard Reeves in his timely work Dream Hoarders.

Educational attainment has increasingly strongly predicted labor market attachment and earnings since the 1980s.

This divergence means men who do not complete college face structurally lower chances of stable employment, not personal laziness. The labor market rewards cognitive and credentialed skills that historically advantaged men in manufacturing and trade.

The Psychological Impact of Labor Detachment Is Underrated

Psychologists such as Arlie Hochschild (The Second Shift, 1989) and sociologists Michael Kimmel (Manhood in America, 1996) highlight how work provides not just income but identity, structure, and community.

Involuntary non‑employment correlates strongly with increased risks of depression, substance abuse, and social isolation.

The loss of both economic role and social identity at scale. Women often assume emotional labor to stabilize families where male partners are disengaged, a burden unpaid and uncounted.

Crime Statistics Reveal Deeper Social Failures

It is true that, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, males constitute roughly 90% of the incarcerated population and are over‑represented in violent crime.

But causation is not biological: it is structural.

The Open University research links early economic marginalization, school dropout, and community disinvestment to later criminal activity.

When labor markets exclude young men without alternatives, some turn to informal economies, a structural problem, not a character flaw.

Public Policy Responses Have Mostly Addressed Symptoms, Not Causes

Post‑2008 recession policies, such as extended unemployment insurance and Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (2014) programs, offered re‑training, but not at scale.

Historically, job-training programs have had low completion and placement rates for displaced men without degrees.

Meanwhile, safety net programs such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and disability benefits have grown, but they do not constitute pathways to employment.

Without targeted investment in adult education, apprenticeships, and community economic development, the underlying deficit remains.

The Care Economy Is Gendered, And Women Are Bearing the Costs

Women still shoulder the majority of unpaid care, childbearing, elder care, and domestic labor, even when they work full-time.

The OECD finds that U.S. women do nearly twice as much unpaid care work as men.

This work has an estimated annual economic value of $1.5 trillion, according to McKinsey Global Institute, yet it is unremunerated.

As men disengage economically, women often take on both paid and unpaid work, effectively subsidizing households and local economies.

Also on MSN: 12 strategies women can use to protect their boundaries with family

Cultural Narratives on Masculinity Have Not Evolved with the Economy

Traditional norms of masculinity, emotional stoicism, breadwinner status, and provider role remain deeply embedded in U.S. culture.

When the economy no longer rewards that identity, men are left with a mismatch between cultural expectation and structural reality.

This is not an individual deficit; it is a gendered identity crisis, recognized in feminist theory as a normative lag in which social scripts fail to adjust to material conditions.

Women’s Progress Alters Family Power, Not Male Work

It is a common conservative narrative to claim women’s employment “crowds out” men, but two decades of labor economics research reject that.

The National Bureau of Economic Research shows labor supply shifts among women expanded total employment opportunities without statistically depressing male employment.

Instead, women’s earnings strengthen household resilience. They also change bargaining power in relationships.

This sometimes triggers backlash rooted in perceived status loss rather than structural occupational displacement.

Key takeaways

• Male Labor Retreat Is Worsening: Millions of prime‑age men, especially those without college degrees, are leaving the workforce, creating structural economic and family pressures.
• Opioid Crisis Amplifies Disengagement: Men are disproportionately affected by opioid addiction and overdose, further reducing labor force participation and productivity.
• Women Absorb the Burden: Mothers, partners, and sisters often provide unpaid caregiving, emotional support, and household management while maintaining their own jobs.
• Education and Economic Security Are Central: Men without stable employment or postsecondary education are significantly less likely to marry and form independent households.
• Structural Change, Not Women’s Progress: The shift in family and labor dynamics reflects broader economic and social transformations, not the advancement of women alone.

Disclosure line: This article was developed with the assistance of AI and was subsequently reviewed, revised, and approved by our editorial team.

Like our content? Be sure to follow us