| |

The retirement plan more women should be talking about

For generations, the picture of a successful retirement was fairly predictable: a couple growing old together in the family home, eventually downsizing or perhaps moving into a retirement community.

But what happens when there is no couple?

Women tend to live longer than men, and millions reach their later years divorced, widowed, never married, or simply uninterested in finding another romantic partner. Increasingly, some are considering a different option: living with other women.

Think The Golden Girls, but less sitcom and more retirement strategy.

Women are buying homes together, renting rooms to friends, joining cohousing communities, or creating informal arrangements in which they maintain their independence while sharing expenses, companionship, household responsibilities, and some of the practical challenges of getting older.

And when you look at the financial and social realities facing older women, the idea starts making a surprising amount of sense.

More women are facing retirement alone

Women make up a particularly large share of Americans aging on their own.

According to a 2026 analysis from Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies, 10 million of the 16 million older Americans who live alone are women. Nearly 20 million women age 65 and older now head households, and women represent about two-thirds of householders who reach their 90s.

Living alone can be wonderfully freeing. You decide when to eat, what to watch, how to decorate, and whether anyone is allowed to touch the thermostat.

But independence can become more complicated with age.

There are expenses to manage, household repairs to handle, transportation needs, illnesses, falls, and eventually the possibility of needing help with everyday tasks.

Living alone also means that when something goes wrong, there may be nobody else in the house to notice.

The financial argument may be even stronger

Retirement can be particularly challenging financially for women.

Harvard researchers found that older female-headed households had a median income of about $48,000, compared with $71,000 for households headed by older men. Among women living alone, median household income was just $31,000.

Housing consumes a significant share of that money.

About 39% of older female-headed households are housing-cost burdened, meaning they spend at least 30% of their income on housing. Among female renters 65 and older who live alone, the figure rises to 66%.

Sharing a home can radically change that equation.

Instead of three women maintaining three kitchens, three living rooms, three sets of utilities, three internet bills, and three homes, they can divide many of those expenses.

For a homeowner, renting a room can also generate retirement income without requiring her to leave the home she loves.

AARP notes that home sharing can provide supplemental income for older homeowners while giving housemates a more affordable alternative to living alone.

You may want to read: 10 U.S. Cities Where Rent and Housing Are Actually Affordable

Then there is the loneliness problem

Money isn’t the only reason women are considering communal living.

Social isolation can become a serious problem as people age. Retirement removes workplace relationships. Children may live far away. Friends move or die. Driving may become difficult. A spouse or partner may be gone.

Research from the University of Michigan’s National Poll on Healthy Aging found that about one-third of adults ages 50 to 80 reported lacking companionship, while people living alone were among those more likely to experience loneliness or isolation.

Shared housing doesn’t guarantee friendship, of course. But it builds something valuable into everyday life: other people are around.

Someone notices you haven’t come downstairs.

Someone asks if you need anything from the grocery store.

Someone is there to have coffee with in the morning or complain to about the plumber.

Those seemingly insignificant interactions can become increasingly important when work and family no longer provide automatic daily contact.

Cohousing takes the idea one step further

senior woman gardening
jackf via 123RF

Some women don’t necessarily want roommates but still want the benefits of community.

That’s where cohousing comes in.

Cohousing typically combines private homes with shared spaces and a deliberate emphasis on interaction among neighbors. Residents might have their own apartment or cottage while sharing gardens, gathering spaces, workshops, kitchens, or other facilities.

AARP describes cohousing as one option that can allow older adults to maintain independence while creating stronger social connections and opportunities for neighbors to help one another.

Research involving five elder cohousing communities found that residents generally reported satisfaction with their experience and had moved there largely because they were seeking a stronger sense of community.

That distinction matters.

The goal isn’t necessarily to live together. It is to avoid aging in isolation.

Women are already experimenting with the idea

This isn’t merely theoretical.

AARP recently followed a group of women who traveled to New Mexico specifically to explore whether a Golden Girls-style arrangement might work for them as they aged. They considered the obvious attractions—companionship and affordability—but also confronted the less glamorous questions involving privacy, caregiving, chores, finances, and compatibility.

Other women are creating their own versions.

Some longtime friends purchase property together. Some homeowners rent rooms to women of similar ages. Others choose intentional communities or live close enough to friends to create informal support networks without actually sharing a front door.

AARP has also documented women over 50 deliberately creating shared living arrangements as a way to combine independence with emotional, social, and financial support.

There is no single Golden Girls model.

And that’s probably the point.

You don’t have to be single to see the appeal

Shared or community-oriented retirement living isn’t only relevant to women who never married.

Women statistically have a greater likelihood of eventually living without a spouse simply because they tend to live longer. Divorce can change plans, too.

That means a woman who retires at 65 with a partner may still need to think about how she would want to live at 75, 85, or 95.

Building strong friendships and community before they’re desperately needed may be one of the most overlooked parts of retirement planning.

We spend decades being told to prepare financially for retirement.

Perhaps we should be asking:

Who are you planning to grow old with?

But choose your Golden Girls carefully

Anyone who has ever had a roommate knows that companionship comes with compromises.

Your best friend may be wonderful company on vacation and absolutely maddening when she leaves dishes in the sink every night.

Before moving in together, women need conversations that go well beyond deciding who gets the biggest bedroom.

Who pays for what? How are groceries handled? Can partners or family members stay overnight? What happens if someone wants to move out? Who owns the furniture? How clean should the house be? Are pets welcome? How much privacy does everyone expect?

And perhaps the biggest question of all:

What happens when somebody needs care?

Living together doesn’t automatically make housemates responsible for bathing, dressing, transporting, or caring for one another.

That expectation needs to be discussed explicitly, particularly because long-term care can become extraordinarily expensive. Harvard researchers found that only about 14% of adults 75 and older living alone could afford even a daily home-health aide visit after paying their other living expenses.

Friendship is not a substitute for professional care.

Put the boring stuff in writing

Image credit: PeopleImages/Shutterstock

If friends decide to share a home, enthusiasm shouldn’t replace legal planning.

The arrangement may require a lease, co-ownership agreement, household-expense agreement, or other written contract depending on who owns the property and how finances are structured.

Women buying property together should think carefully about what happens if one person dies, becomes incapacitated, wants to sell, can no longer pay her share, or needs to move into assisted living.

Estate plans matter too. So do powers of attorney, healthcare proxies, insurance, and clear rules about what housemates can—and cannot—decide for one another.

A few hours spent with an attorney before moving in could prevent an enormous conflict later.

It may offer something retirement communities can’t

Traditional senior communities work beautifully for many people. Shared housing won’t replace them, nor should it.

But living with friends offers something different.

It allows women to construct a later life around relationships they’ve chosen, rather than waiting until declining health determines where and with whom they live.

It can also preserve something older adults repeatedly say they value: independence.

You’re not necessarily being cared for.

You’re living your life with other people nearby.

That’s a very different proposition.

Maybe retirement planning needs another column

Two senior older women sharing a meal.
Image credit shurkin_son via Shutterstock.

We typically calculate retirement around numbers.

How much is in the 401(k)?

When should Social Security begin?

Is the mortgage paid off?

How much will healthcare cost?

All of those questions matter. But they leave out another resource that can become extraordinarily valuable with age: other people.

A group of women who trust one another may be able to share housing expenses, transportation, meals, chores, companionship, and the thousand little tasks that become harder when one person has to do everything alone.

It won’t work for everyone. Some women would rather live alone forever than negotiate another person’s thermostat preferences.

But for others, the happiest version of retirement may turn out not to be a condo in Florida or a sprawling house occupied by one person.

It may be a private bedroom, a shared kitchen, three good friends—and somebody down the hall asking whether you want a glass of wine.

Key takeaway

The Golden Girls model isn’t simply a cute retirement fantasy. For older women confronting higher housing costs, lower retirement incomes, longer lifespans, and the possibility of social isolation, sharing a home or intentionally building a close-knit living community can offer both financial and emotional advantages.

The secret isn’t necessarily living with other women.

It’s recognizing that independence and interdependence don’t have to be opposites.

Reader question

Would you consider living with female friends in retirement—or would you rather live alone?

Author

  • Robin Jaffin headshot circle

    Robin Jaffin is a strategic communicator and entrepreneur dedicated to impactful storytelling, environmental advocacy, and women's empowerment. As Co-Founder of The Queen Zone™, Robin amplifies women's diverse experiences through engaging multimedia content across global platforms. Additionally, Robin co-founded FODMAP Everyday®, an internationally recognized resource improving lives through evidence-based health and wellness support for those managing IBS. With nearly two decades at Verité, Robin led groundbreaking initiatives promoting human rights in global supply chains.

    View all posts

Similar Posts